There are many forms of leadership, but the three most popular forms of leadership. Good leaders do not take a form and stick with it - they will find the right situation for each style. However, excellent leaders do know their dominant style and take advantage of this style. Let's look at three leadership styles and the potential pitfalls of each style. Think about your style - and how to change it in various situations.
Autocratic leadership is also referred to as authoritarian leadership. In this style, the leader usually outlines what he or she wants and how to achieve it. In many ways, autocratic leadership is not leadership but a form of regulatory management. Is this style effective? First, look at this organization. If the organization is full of momentum and maturity, the autocratic situation may be effective. Let us say that you have most of the information you need, but the time to reach a goal is very short. In a proactive organization, you can give authoritarian order and don't worry about what to do - as long as it doesn't become your dominant style. If you are an authoritarian and authoritarian leader, you may not get a good response from your organization. One of the pitfalls of authoritarian leadership is that it may be plunged into an abusive or degrading model - that is why you should use dictatorship in rare circumstances, certainly not formal ones. If you agree with a dominant dictatorship, consider redeploying a more participatory leadership style.
Participatory or democratic leadership is the style in which leaders still outline goals, but allows organizations to agree on the goals. But democratic leaders still need approval from the decision of any team member. Democracy may play a role in spreading information between leaders and team members. This style can also be an appropriate way for an autocratic leader to convert this style - without completely controlling the team. This leadership style is very helpful for teams that have not previously been authorized. This is also a good way to test the team's knowledge and abilities, and then turn into a less controlled leadership style. Because this leadership style is basically a form of autocracy, leaders may easily return to authoritarian status. If the team fails or fails, the democratic leadership allows them to redefine plans and activities - without telling them what to do.
The third and most empowering form of leadership is laissez-faire or representative. The representative leader sets overall priorities, goals, or directives, but it makes things a reality. With this style, the leader is responsible for all decisions - but leaving the decision to the team. This also means that team members need to analyze, evaluate and change issues and problems. This style of leadership is absolutely suitable for mature or higher-level teams - those teams that sometimes prove themselves to leaders and have confidence in all issues. One of the biggest flaws of this type of leadership is failure. If there is a problem, the leadership should not blame the team - this is probably a natural reaction to a laissez-faire leader.
Now that we have seen three dominant leadership styles, which one are you? Remember that the hallmark of a good leader is the ability to use various styles depending on the circumstances - a bad leader always sticks to the same style. What is the situation for each style? If you have a new team, you may want to use authoritarian style as a means to evaluate the team and its members. But what if you are placed in a position that allows most teams to understand their tasks well and will not react to the autocratic situation? Use a participatory style in this situation - let the team invest in the decision making process. Remember that you can empower yourself as a leader and use this style of team. Finally, if your team members understand the situation better than you? Take a commissioning method, let the team make its own decisions, always remind them that you will be responsible for the results.
When you decide what kind of leadership style to take, there are some things to consider. First of all, how much time do you have? If your time is very limited, participatory or automated may be the best style. Of course, this also depends on the team and its composition - if you have an experienced team and time is limited, then you don't need to use an autocratic situation. Simply explain and emphasize that time is limited. You should also consider who has the information related to the project or task at hand - if the information is distributed among you, the leader and the team, you may need to take a participatory position. If your team has all the information, attend a delegation stage - let them use their information to suggest the best solution. Also consider the type of task you are working on - how complex is it? Compare this with the team's skills and you should be able to choose the appropriate leadership style.
If your dominant style is more automated, you may need to study content that prevents you from entering a participatory position. If you are one of the other two types, you may get a good response from your team. Just remember to change your leadership style according to your situation - don't stick to a style. When you start moving different styles, you will find that your team will respond.
[ad_2]
Orignal From: What is your style of leadership?
No comments:
Post a Comment